What type of vehicle is typically covered under the doctrine of strict liability?

The doctrine of strict liability applies to certain types of cases where an individual or company can be held liable for damages without the need to prove negligence or intent. Typically, this doctrine is prominently associated with wild animals. When a person owns or possesses a wild animal, they can be responsible for any harm that the animal causes, regardless of the precautions they took to prevent such harm. This concept stems from the notion that wild animals are inherently unpredictable and pose a risk to the public.

In contrast, domesticated animals generally do not fall under strict liability unless there is evidence of prior aggression or a known dangerous propensity. For commercial trucks and motorcycles, liability typically revolves around proving negligence or recklessness rather than strict liability. Thus, wild animals stand out as the correct application in this context, illustrating the fundamental principles of strict liability in the realm of animal-related incidents.